JAPANESE TOP Message from the Director Information Faculty list Research Projects International Conference Entrance Exam Visitors Publication Job Vacancy International Partnerships Links Access HANDBOOK FOR INTERNATIONAL RESEARCHERS Map of Inuyama
TOPICS
BONOBO Chimpanzee "Ai" Crania photos Itani Jun'ichiro archives Guidelines for Care and Use of Nonhuman Primates(pdf) Study material catalogue/database Guideline for field research of non-human primates Primate Genome DB

Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University
Inuyama, Aichi 484-8506, JAPAN
TEL. +81-568-63-0567
(Administrative Office)
FAX. +81-568-63-0085

Copyright (c)
Primate Research Institute,
Kyoto University All rights reserved.


Contact

Wakibara / Poster

Wakibara, J (1); Matsubara, M (2); and Hanya, G (3).

Affiliations: (1, 3) Laboratory of Human Evolution Studies, Kyoto University (2) Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University. (1) To whom correspondence should be made.

     Frequency of geophagia amongst Japanese monkeys Macaca fuscata in natural and food enhanced situations: Implications on the role of geophagy. The frequency of soil eating by Japanese monkeys Macaca fuscata in a food enhanced and natural foraging situation respectively was compared over a one year period through observations of focal individuals. In both situations, geophagia was predominant in young animals, prevailed in afternoon hours and occurred at a more or less steady frequency on annual basis. The food-enhanced monkeys at Arashiyama consistently outweighed by far those relying on wild foods at Yakushima in soil eating rate even though the bulk of foods eaten at the former site is considered less toxic. The possibility that soils were eaten to detoxify foods at either of the sites is less implicated and the rather rich dietary profiles at both sites do not suggest that soil was eaten for nourishment. It is proposed that the eaten soils serve to alleviate gastric disorders related to intake of plant based foods. The overt difference in frequency of soil consumption between the two sites is discussed in relation to dietary differences. The need to gather soil-eating data from additional populations living in such contrasting feeding habitats is emphasized.