ENGLISH トップ 所長挨拶 概要 教員一覧 研究分野・施設 共同利用・共同研究 大型プロジェクト 国際集会 教育,入試 広報,公開行事,年報 新着論文,出版 教員,職員公募 国際共同事業 霊長類研究基金 リンク アクセス HANDBOOK FOR INTERNATIONAL RESEARCHERS Map of Inuyama サイトマップ
トピックス
コラム・連載 質疑応答コーナー ボノボ チンパンジー「アイ」 頭蓋骨画像データベース 霊長類学文献データベース サル類の飼育管理及び使用に関する指針 Study material catalogue/database 野生霊長類研究ガイドライン 霊長類ゲノムデータベース 写真アーカイヴ ビデオアーカイヴ

京都大学霊長類研究所
郵便番号484-8506
愛知県犬山市官林
TEL. 0568-63-0567(大代表)
FAX. 0568-63-0085

本ホーム・ページの内容の
無断転写を禁止します。
Copyright (c)
Primate Research Institute,
Kyoto University All rights reserved.


お問い合わせ

English

Excretion patterns of solute and different-sized particle passage markers in foregut-fermenting proboscis monkey (Nasalis larvatus) do not indicate an adaptation for rumination

Ikki Matsuda, John C.M. Sha, Sylvia Ortmannc, Angela Schwarmd, Florian Grandld, Judith Catone, Warner Jensf, Michael Kreuzerd, Diana Marlenab, Katharina B. Hageng, Marcus Clauss

Physiology & Behavior

Behavioral observations and small fecal particles compared to other primates indicate that free-ranging proboscis monkeys (Nasalis larvatus) have a strategy of facultative merycism (rumination). In functional ruminants (ruminant and camelids), rumination is facilitated by a particle sorting mechanism in the forestomach that selectively retains larger particles and subjects them to repeated mastication. Using a set of a solute and three particle markers of different sizes (< 2, 5 and 8 mm), we displayed digesta passage kinetics and measured mean retention times (MRTs) in four captive proboscis monkeys (6–18 kg) and compared the marker excretion patterns to those in domestic cattle. In addition, we evaluated various methods of calculating and displaying passage characteristics. The mean ± SD dry matter intake was 98 ± 22 g kg-0.75 d-1, 68 ± 7% of which was browse. Accounting for sampling intervals in MRT calculation yielded results that were not affected by the sampling frequency. Displaying marker excretion patterns using fecal marker concentrations (rather than amounts) facilitated comparisons with reactor theory outputs and indicated that both proboscis and cattle digestive tracts represent a series of very few tank reactors. However, the separation of the solute and particle marker and the different-sized particle markers, evident in cattle, did not occur in proboscis monkeys, in which all markers moved together, at MRTs of approximately 40 h. The results indicate that the digestive physiology of proboscis monkeys does not show typical characteristics of ruminants, which may explain why merycism is only a facultative strategy in this species. 

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938415003030

MAY/26/2015